---
title: "Adversarial review: a second model checks the first model's work"
date: 2026-10-24
url: "https://morningtokens.com/workflows/adversarial-review-a-second-model-checks-the-first/"
source: "https://x.com/cbarmorecpa/status/2112888318237061532"
issue: "https://morningtokens.com/issues/2026-10-24/"
---

# Adversarial review: a second model checks the first model's work

## How can AI replace manually checking everything AI produced, or asking the same model to review its own output?

- **Replaces:** manually checking everything AI produced, or asking the same model to review its own output.
- **What to connect:**
  - Claude for the original work.
  - Codex (or several models) as independent reviewers, told to hunt for bugs, bad formulas and weak conclusions.
  - A "judge" agent that merges and ranks the findings, then the original Claude thread to fix what holds up.
- **Who it's for:** accountants, analysts and developers whose AI output has real consequences if it's wrong.

Source: https://x.com/cbarmorecpa/status/2112888318237061532

From the Morning Tokens issue of 2026-10-24: https://morningtokens.com/issues/2026-10-24/